NEWS 11/11/20 Wed: Fake Debunkings of Real Evidence of Voter Fraud!
VIDEO ARCHIVE: Periscope/Twitter | YouTube | Podcast via jlptalk.com
Hake News for The Jesse Lee Peterson Show, Wednesday, November 11, 2020
End of Hour 1: Lots of FAKE debunkings of voter fraud! They say the mail carrier Richard Hopkins recanted his statement while he says he did not!
End of Hour 2: They’re trying to “debunk” that dead people voted! But what’s the truth?! Who are you gonna believe?
After JLP, catch The Hake Report.
11/11/20 Wed: Hour 1
Jesse takes calls, helping some, and others are ridiculous.
HAKE NEWS Hr1
Lots of FAKE debunkings of voter fraud!
End of Hour 1, Weds, Nov 11, 2020
Stay tuned for Hour 2
Happy Veterans Day!
(CNN) Starting today, those who have served in the US armed forces (aka veterans), as well as Gold Star families (family of those who’ve died), will have free access to national parks for life. The Veterans Affairs (VA) website posted the announcement quoting President Trump’s Dept. of Interior Sec. David Bernhardt — a Republican and oil and energy lobbyist: NICE.
LOTS OF FAKE DEBUNKINGS OF POSTAL VOTER FRAUD
(Drudge) Postal worker admits fabricating allegations of tampering… (Seattle Times / Wash. Compost) BUT IS THIS FAKE NEWS? By Shawn Boburg and Jacob Bogage
(Far-left Twitter) Pennsylvania postal worker recants allegations of ballot tampering, Washington Post, Washington Examiner and NYT report FALSELY!! TMZ was sure to be on the case — like the others, they too transparently hate President Trump. BTW, THIS IS ALSO FAKE NEWS, BECAUSE WASH. EXAMINER ONLY CITES THE DEMOCRATS… and notes that this guy DISPUTES IT. (Twitter’s headlines are misleading!)
He supposedly signed an affidavit withdrawing allegations that he'd witnessed mail-in ballot tampering in Erie, many FAKE NEWS outlets are claiming. The worker, Richard Hopkins (WHO’S ALSO A VETERAN, I HEAR!), appeared in a PROJECT VERITAS video WITH JAMES O’KEEFE on Tuesday denying he had recanted. Democrats on the House Oversight Committee said the "whistleblower completely recanted his allegations of a supervisor tampering with mail-in ballots after being questioned by investigators." OK SO DEMOCRATS AND MSM ARE LYING IN SAYING THAT HE DID, BUT HE SAYS HE DIDN’T.
In the Project Veritas video, he says that he feels he just got played, and the official was completely messing with him, talking out of both sides of his mouth, admitting to trying to scare him.
Real news from The Epoch Times:
USPS Pennsylvania Whistleblower Richard Hopkins: 'I Did Not Recant'
On Nov. 7, Senate Judiciary Chairman Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) received a sworn affidavit signed by mail carrier Richard Hopkins under the penalty of perjury, alleging that a local postmaster, Rob Weisenbach, had instructed USPS workers to collect mail ballots they receive after Nov. 3 and hand them over to him to be backdated.
Hopkins, 32, who has since been placed on non-pay status by the Erie Post Office, said that he is willing to testify about his claim under oath. He claimed that he heard Weisenbach tell a supervisor that he was backdating ballots “to make it appear as though the ballots had been collected on November 3, 2020, despite them in fact being collected on November 4 and possibly later.”
The House Oversight Committee on Tuesday claimed that Hopkins went back on his allegations of ballot tampering, saying that investigators from the USPS Office of Inspector General had told the committee that the whistleblower had signed a sworn affidavit recanting his claims.
Investigators “informed Committee staff today that they interviewed Hopkins on Friday, but that Hopkins RECANTED HIS ALLEGATIONS yesterday and did not explain why he signed a false affidavit,” Democrats on the panel said in a statement on Twitter.
The Washington Post published a report echoing similar claims, citing three anonymous officials briefed on the investigation, and the statement.
DEBUNKING THE FAKE DEBUNKING
Hopkins soon denied the allegations in a video posted by James O’Keefe of Project Veritas, a watchdog who first publicized Hopkins’s accusations.
“My name is Richard Hopkins, I’m a postal employee who came out and whistleblew on the Erie, Pennsylvania postal service, postal office. I am right at this very moment looking at an article written by the Washington Post—it says that I fabricated the allegations of ballot tampering,” Hopkins said.
“I’m here to say that I did not recant my statements, that didn’t happen, that is not what happened. You will find out tomorrow, and I would like that the Washington Post recant their wonderful little article that they decided to throw out there, out at random.”
O’Keefe separately claimed that Hopkins was “coerced” by federal agents in a four-hour interrogation without representation, and that he has footage that would be released in full on Wednesday.
A partial clip released Tuesday night appears to be recording of a meeting between Hopkins and USPS Office of the Inspector General Agent Russell Strasser.
(Wash. Examiner) Mr. Hopkins said he did not believe the federal agents who interrogated him were interested in investigating alleged election fraud.
“Honestly, I don’t think they are,” he said.
James O’Keefe tweeted: We have recordings of the federal agents, who COERCED this man through a 4 hour interrogation Without representation, who stands by his original affidavit re: backdating ballots.
Standby for recordings doubling down on backdating ballots.
This is soviet style truth suppression
(Revolver) No, the USPS whistleblower did not recant…Richard Hopkins says he was coerced — with no lawyer present — to sign a statement he didn’t understand… (AM Greatness)
11/11/20 Wed: Hour 2
Jesse talks...
HAKE NEWS Hr2
They’re trying to “debunk” that dead people voted! But what’s the truth?! Who are you gonna believe?
End of Hour 2, Weds, Nov 11, 2020
Stay tuned for Hour 3. After JLP, The Hake Report. Also Sunday Service Archive premiere today 4 PM rebuildingtheman.com/church
They’re also claiming dead people didn’t vote
(Far-left Twitter) Thousands of dead people did not cast votes in Michigan or Pennsylvania, CNN and FactCheck.org report — AND THEY ARE NOT EXACTLY OBJECTIVE!
There is no evidence that thousands of dead people voted in the 2020 US elections in Wayne County, Michigan, according to fact-checking by CNN and PolitiFact. There is also no evidence that a substantial number of votes were fraudulently cast by dead people in Pennsylvania, The FAILING New York Slimes and FactCheck.org report.
- A CNN analysis of a viral claim suggesting that there are thousands of cases of ballots being cast in the name of the deceased “did not find a single instance of that happening.”
- Claims have also circulated suggesting that dead people cast ballots in Pennsylvania. However, election experts say that while this occasionally happens, "it is exceedingly rare," FactCheck.org reports.
SHENANIGANS
But The Epoch Times (LOOK IT UP, IT’S PRONOUNCED EPOCH, NOT EPOCH, UNLESS YOU’RE BRITISH OR STUBBORN OR IGNORANT) says:
More Than 10,000 Dead People Cast Ballots in Michigan, Analysis Shows
More than 10,000 people confirmed or suspected dead have returned their mail-in ballots to vote in Michigan, according to an analysis of the state’s election data.
About 9,500 voters confirmed dead through the Social Security Death Index (SSDI) are marked in the state’s mail voting database as having returned ballots. Another nearly 2,000 are 100 years old or more and aren’t listed as known living centenarians.
The analysis was provided by Richard Baris (AKA @Peoples_Pundit on Twitter), director of Big Data Poll (not Open Data Poll, my mistake).
The data indicates that somebody else was trying to vote on behalf of these people.
“It’s also entirely possible that some of them aren’t even real people,” Baris told The Epoch Times via email. “If someone is 110 or some ridiculous age, we should have their death record but do not.”
Americans older than 110 are exceedingly rare; only a handful of such seniors are known to live in Michigan.
According to the 2010 Census, there were 1,729 centenarians in Michigan (pdf).
SIDE NOTE
NOTE: I looked up the Open Data PA gov’t website (2020 General Election Mail Ballot Requests, Department of State), and they said: “The reason some birth dates will display as 1/1/1800 is due to confidentiality reasons of the registered voters. Usually this is for victims of domestic violence.” They DON’T explain the birthdates from 1850, 1854, 1894, 1899, 1900, 1903
Gov’t denies problems
Even if somebody tried to vote on behalf of a deceased person, the vote would be rejected, according to Tracy Wimmer, spokeswoman for the Michigan secretary of state.
“Ballots of voters who have died are rejected in Michigan, even if the voter cast an absentee ballot and then died before Election Day,” she previously told The Epoch Times via email.
However, Baris isn’t convinced.
“While I’m open to the idea some of these have been rejected, I’m not open to any outright dismissal they all were rejected,” he said in a Nov. 8 tweet.
The data on how many ballots were rejected isn’t available yet, Wimmer said.
She said that “a ballot received for a living voter may be recorded in a way that makes it appear as if the voter is dead.”
“This can be because of voters with similar names, where the ballot is accidentally recorded as voted by John Smith Sr., when it was actually voted by John Smith Jr., or because of inaccurately recorded birth dates in the qualified voter file.”
This only happens “on rare occasions,” she said.
Background
Democratic nominee Joe Biden leads in Michigan by less than 150,000 votes. The Trump campaign filed a lawsuit in Michigan to halt vote counting until Republican observers are granted adequate access. The GOP-led Michigan legislature is investigating allegations of election irregularities in the state.
In a Nov. 9 lawsuit, a Detroit poll watcher alleged thousands of mail-in ballots from people who weren’t properly registered to vote were added to vote counts.
Poll operators were adding names and addresses to the poll book with made-up birth dates, such as 1/1/1900, he said in a sworn affidavit.
Baris said the mail voting data he worked from likely isn’t up to date enough to capture any irregularities that happened Election Day and after.
“If they did that on Election Day in Michigan, then we likely wouldn’t know until December,” he said. “If it is true, then they’d, unfortunately, get away with it in the short-term.”
11/11/20 Wed: Hour 3
Jesse talks...
--
After JLP, catch The Hake Report.